Amazon: Building The World’s Most Customer-Centric Company

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for amazon_logo.jpg

I received an email from Amazon a few days ago informing me that they were refunding me $2.50 on an item that I had preordered.  The reason offered for the refund was “pre-order price protection.” 

Two things about the email got my attention.  

First, the company had reached out to me of its own accord.  If someone had walked up to me minutes before I read the email and quizzed me on Amazon’s “pre-order price protection” feature, I would have got an F, because I would have replied – “what’s that?”

Second, and even more interesting was the claim at the bottom of the email – We are building the world’s most customer-centric company

Since customer-centricity is a hot topic and a priority for several business professionals and companies I decided to dig deeper and discover what makes Amazon so customer centric.  Amazon’s own explanation – a place where you can find and buy anything online – doesn’t quite cut it from me.  It may serve well as an advertisement for the world’s largest online bazaar, or as a vision statement, but not as an explanation.  

So, I went digging to understand how Amazon – the entire company – organizes itself around the customer.   I decided to use Jay Galbraith’s 5-point framework of Strategy, Structure, People, Processes, and Rewards to guide my inquiry.

Strategy and Culture: The true character of a company is revealed by the choices it makes and not by the slogans on the T-shirts it wears.  Every company wants to get closer to its customers.  Few succeed.  Because despite the rhetoric, most companies still love their brands, technologies, and factories more than they love their customers.  Not Amazon.  It has very successfully crossed this chasm – its strategic choices are directed by a simple dictum, what’s good for the customer in the long run is good for us.  It is strategically obsessed with continually creating and innovating customer value; it doesn’t waste its energy and/or resources obsessing about itself or its competitors. 

Structure: Agility and Flexibility are greatly valued traits in organizations.  However, without the spinal strength of conviction, agility and flexibility is merely blowing in the wind.  As the great poet Kipling advises us:

If you can keep your head when all about you

Are losing theirs and blaming it on you;

If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,

But make allowance for their doubting too;

Translated, in an organizational setting, it is the balance between the exuberance of the shorts with the pragmatism of the suits that holds the key to future performance.  Amazon has done well in striking a balance between when to throw the organization chart out of the window and when to dig in and let experience rule.

Processes: The fundamental goal of most processes should be to provide the customer with a hassle-free experience.  Too many companies are so preoccupied with knocking the socks off their customers that they forget the leaky pipes and flooded basements.  Companies first need to get the basics right – customer delight will follow.  Amazon’s processes are transparent and motivated by a single dominant concern – how to help customers buy more intelligently.  Its One-click check out, Golden Box, Bottom of the page deals, Look Inside, warning messages if a customer is placing an order for something they have already bought before, its willingness to feature negative customer review on its own site – all point to one very simple motivation – if it makes sense from the customers’ point-of-view, give it to them.  Simple.

Rewards: So much has been written about the dangers of the next quarter mentality, yet so many companies continue to pursue it zealously.  A long-term view is not for the faint of heart.  Amazon has very successfully demonstrated the benefits of shunning lollypops and candy for more enduring sustenance and nutrition.  By actively deciding against chasing quick bucks Amazon has successfully invested in ongoing customer relationships and built long-term customer equity.

People: I have blogged about and spoken at conferences about the importance of employees to the innovation and customer value creation process on a number of occasions. I am not the only one.  Vineet Nayar’s book Employees First: Customers Second (a much misunderstood title) is a candidate for the best book award in the Thinkers 50 competition. Without the right people, customer-centricity will remain a slogan; the employees will hear the sirens, no one will move.  Amazon is on the move, it is excessively persnickety about who it hires, and rightly so!

The purpose of this blog is not put Amazon on a pedestal.  There is too much of that going on in today’s business world, too much chest thumping – look at me, look at me, see how great I am. The purpose of this blog is to simply give the reader a behind the scenes understanding of the key factors contributing to Amazon’s ongoing drive to becoming the world’s most customer-centric company.  That’s it.  

Does this mean that Amazon is forever blessed, destined to succeed for all times to come?  Far from it! Building the world’s most customer-centric company is a journey, not a destination.  Besides, future success is never guaranteed, least of all to today’s most successful.

 

Marketing Myopia and Other Ted Levitt Classics: Paying Homage To A Prodigious Thinker

TedLevitt.jpg

Recently, I was in Hyderabad, India, teaching a course on Customer-Focused Marketing Strategy at the Indian School of Business.  As a pre-reading for the course, I recommended Ted Levitt’s classic article Marketing Myopia – classics do have their place, even in an age of bulimic sound bytes! 

Even though I have read Marketing Myopia several times, I favored discretion over valor and decided to read it one more time, just in case somebody was hell bent on peppering me with tough questions. 

Reading the article again was more than just a born again experience.  It was a lesson in humility.  Here was an article, first written in 1960, that had nailed several things we are still wrestling with today.  Little wonder that the late Ted Levitt is regarded as one of the most widely respected thinkers in the field of marketing and management. His work and writings have changed the way companies think about their businesses, organize for innovation and creativity, and market their products and services. 

A homage to some of Ted Levitt’s best thinking follows:


Marketing Myopia


The article that gave rise to the famous aphorism – “Customers don’t buy 1/4″ drills, they buy 1/4″ holes.”  It still provokes serious thinking.  The big idea – get companies to think of their businesses in terms of customers needs, not in terms of the physical products and services they produce.  Levitt asserted that all companies and industries were once growth industries.  If they have stopped growing it is not because markets are saturated, but because management failed to correctly grasp what business the company was in.  Invariably, companies that run into growth problems suffer from one overarching weakness; they are overly focused on physical products and services – credit cards, cell phones, mortgages, HDTV – and less on customers and their needs.

After the Sale is Over  – - -

Long before there was CRM and Relationship Marketing, Ted Levitt was discussing the importance of cultivating relationships with customers.  The big idea – a sale signals the end of courtship and the beginning of a marriage with the customer.  The quality of the marriage determines whether there will be continued or expanded business, or troubles and divorce.  Levitt considered relationships with customers as an asset.  The more complex the product and service, the more salient the customers’ needs, the more critical and valuable is this asset.  He advised companies to manage and continually invest in this asset, since over time relationships would trump all other aspects of the marketing system, including technology. 

Marketing Success Through Differentiation – of Anything

The big idea – every company should resist the push towards becoming a commodity, by attempting to differentiate not only their products and services, but by differentiating their whole business, in terms of what they offer and how they operate.  What we call reinventing business models today.    To elaborate, the basics of checking and savings accounts at Citi, Bank of America, Chase, and HSBC may be identical, but how these banks do business and the resultant customer experience may be wholly different/differentiated, and hence a non-commodity.

Moral of the story – knowing the catch phrases from the most recent NY Times best seller list may get you attention at cocktail parties.  But knowing the essence of classical marketing and business writings will get you the promotion you desire and significantly add to your bank balance!  Not a bad thing in any age, especially in today’s recessionary times.

Barriers to Customer-Centricity

Have you heard Branford Marsalis‘ rendition of I heard you twice the first time

That’s what you feel like telling most companies when you hear their claims to be customer-centric. It is difficult to pick up an annual report without hearing loud assertions of customer-centricity and customer value focus.

But few companies have started the journey in earnest, and fewer still can claim proficiency.

A Gartner Group report informs us that by 2007 fewer than 20% of marketing organizations among the Global 1000 enterprises had evolved enough to successfully leverage customer centric processes and capabilities.
The same Gartner report offers companies a performance tip. It advises that marketers that devote at least 50% of their time to advanced customer marketing processes and capabilities will achieve marketing ROI at least 30% greater than their peers who lack such an emphasis.
But this kind of thinking and exhortation is not new. In the 1950′s and 1960′s thinkers like Peter Drucker and Ted Levitt were urging companies to focus on the customer and customer needs – customers don’t buy ¼” drills, they buy ¼” holes. 
For several years now marketing scholars have been advocating firms to shift their thinking away from a brand-centered way of thinking – managing product portfolios, to a customer-centered way of thinking – managing customer portfolios. Recent research has demonstrated quite conclusively that customer value is an excellent proxy for firm value and that companies investing in customer-centric initiatives enjoy higher financial returns.
The question that naturally arises is: “Why haven’t more companies become addicted to a customer-centric way of life?”

After all, customer-centricity sounds right, it feels right, it even does right (higher financial returns). Why then the lag in evolution?

If we want to go beyond the usual suspects of culture and leadership, we will need to check our assumptions.  Quite a few of them are not true, the most notable being that strategy failures are due mainly due to failures of conceptualization and implementation.  But as I like to explain in my strategy courses, organizations are people, and most strategy failures are human failures.
Three human failures:

1) insufficient appreciation of a significant other,
2) the inability to visualize an alternate reality, and
3) the lack of will,

provide a non-traditional explanation why the signal to noise ratio for customer-centricity is so low.

Do companies really value their customers?
As ridiculous as the question sounds, it must be asked, given all the evidence we are surrounded with. Simply put, if they did, companies would behave differently, in a more customer-centric way. If the customer was a significant other of a company in a social sense, the two would have got divorced and stayed permanently divorced.
How do we explain this? Prayer offers an interesting analogy. For the majority of human beings, prayer is still an exercise of the lip affair, not the heart. Similarly, for most companies, customers are a lip affair, not a heart affair. 
For companies to become customer centric, customers must become a heart affair. As long as companies value their personal odyssey for the next round of higher profits and higher sales more than they value customers, this will never happen.

Type in the words “customer centric” in Google, and the first thing you
find is customer-centric selling.  Not customer-centric innovation, not
customer-centric product development, not customer-centric strategy. 
Just selling.

The bare truth is that for most companies, the customer is a mere invisible means to an ever-increasing end; sales, market share, and profits. And the end is invariably more valuable than the means.

Can companies visualize the separate reality that customer-centricity represents?

Jack Nicklaus reportedly
never played a golf shot without first visualizing it in his mind’s eye.  Research conducted by brain scientists
and cognitive psychologists affirms that the ability to visualize positive
outcomes increases the probability of those needs becoming reality

But what if the company
can’t visualize what it really means to be customer-centric?
  After all they can see tangibles like
products, sales, and revenue charts on a daily basis.  And while it may not be ideal or optimum, it is real!

What if this alternate reality is
really more hype than substance, what then?  And since most companies can never quite answer this
question satisfactorily, the alternate reality stays locked
and companies stay
home, foregoing the customer-centric journey, despite its promise of greater
prosperity and riches.

Do companies have the will
to put in the hard yards that living a customer-centric life demands?

By all accounts customer-centricity is hard to build and sustain in large organizations. It requires a
significant investment in people, training, resources, realignment of structure
and processes, and breaking down information and power silos, to name just a
few.  This is hard work and could
test the will of even the most determined CEO. 

A few years ago I was in
Athens, attending a global managers meeting for a large agency.  On the last day a great ritual was staged.  In the old Greek tradition we threw
plates in the air (they were paper plates, throwing real china plates is banned), to
symbolize a break from the past.  We committed ourselves to our customers, to innovation, and went home.  On returning home nothing changed, everything stayed exactly the way it was. 

Most companies want to win
at customer-centricity.  They want
the customer to love them more than their competitors.  But rarely do they have the will to do
whatever it takes to earn the customer’s love.
 
Up to a point, and no more. 

We don’t need more analysis to understand why there is such a huge chasm between what
companies claim by way of customer-centricity and how they actually conduct
their businesses. 

All that we need
is to acknowledge a cold and brutal fact:

customers are not # 1!

And as the
good bard said – “…ay, there’s the rub

About Me

A few words about me.  My name is Gaurav Bhalla.  I’m a strategy, innovation, and marketing professional with global experience, having worked on three continents and with companies in over 20 countries.  Since the mid-70′s, I have been associated with the business world as a consultant, executive, entrepreneur, and academic/executive educator.

I recently launched Knowledge Kinetics, my new entrepreneurial venture. The company will focus on the practice of customer driven innovation and value co-creation. The goal is to provoke deeper thinking and more rigorous execution of initiatives related to innovation and business growth, through a mix of consulting, executive education, and research/analysis.

In my previous incarnation I was the Global Innovation Director, at Kantar-TNS, one of the world’s largest market information and insight companies.  Additionally, I have also held positions in corporate strategy, brand management, sales management, and market research, at companies like Nestle, Richardson Vicks, and Burke.   

I have worked with some of the largest brands in the world, such as GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squib, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, HP, Microsoft, IBM, Motorola, Samsung, Hughes Electronics, Seiko Epson, Coca Cola, P&G, Heinz, Capital One, Wachovia, and NASDAQ. 

I have also served as an adjunct professor at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business and am currently associated with the University of Maryland’s R. H Smith School of Business, as adjunct faculty.

Contact me here >>